
The Love is another sewing machine that I've never actually seen. I think they were later bought up by some other company.
Here's a little oddball of a sewing machine. At first sight I thought it was a Singer 99 because the photo was so bad, but when I actually saw it I knew it wasn't. It's a 3/4 size machine with a matte, wrinkled finish that's called "godzilla".
The obvious oddity was the bobbin. It's a vibrating shuttle with long bobbins (usually seen on treadles), but this is electric. It's a Singer 128 that came out in February 1948.
I always wonder who had my machines first and what they made on them. This one I even wonder why the person chose this particular machine.
Perhaps it was bought later and was on clearance. Maybe it was a little granny who bought it and was used to a treadle--she didn't want to be bothered with one of those new fangled round bobbin contraptions. ?
The shirt is neat though. Look at this next photo. The satin stitich is excellent. The French knots perfect. The outline stitch exact. She certainly could embroider that mom of mine.
Here are the binder and multi-slotted binder with guide pins attachments by Singer. I like saying that one, try it--the multi-slotted binder. I haven't tried the plain binder. Why would I when I have the multi-slotted binder with guide pins?
I tried the multi-slotted binder hooked up to the 15-91. It can take homemade binding of 15/16" in through the scroll where it rolls under the edges and sews it to the fabric at the same time. First cut the binding end into a long triangle and push it through the binder. The fabric goes through the middle of the scroll that you can see in the above photo. I sewed the binding a bit to get it started before putting the fabric in.
In the above photo you can see the binding on the right which trails through the guide pins and off to the right of the sewing machine. The fabric I fed through on the left. The trick is to guide the fabric through touching the inner part of the scroll evenly. It wasn't difficult at all. The binding just fed itself through.



I don't think I've ever seen a Davis sewing machine, but here is a trade card for one. It says it's a copy of a silk etching made on one. I can't get a good close up shot to show those are actually all stitches. Yes, you can machine embroider on a treadle. It takes a lot of practice and patience. Not like me who sits in my chair spinning while my modern machine does the embroidery and beeps at me to change the thread color.
This is a very old baby sacque in a not too good photo. I used to think these were called kimonos but apparently the longer version is called that. This one is all silk with a silk lining. Even the embroidery and crocheted trim are silk. The sides are open.
The stem is outline or stem stitch, leaves are lazy daisies, and flowers are French knots.
Of course this isn't a practical baby outfit. I imagine my great-grandmother popped it on the baby right before company came over and immediately pulled it off when they left.
It's very simple to make. Simplicity has rereleased a similar pattern in their retro collection numbered Simplicity 2900.
I have two Singer buttonholer attachments. Each one had a set of instructions--which didn't go with that particular model. I now have the instruction books for the buttonholer #489500 or #489510, the #121704, and slant shank #160743. None of which I have. Luckily, ISMACS has the instructions I need and all the buttonholer numbers so I can sort everything out. If I ever get a scanner I'll post all my instruction books.
The next buttonholer, as you can see, is a Greist one. It included the feed cover and five templates. I'm a bit confused about Greist attachments. Apparently he made attachments for Singer and then made his own company to make them (?) If you know, let me know. 
They were way up on a shelf in the closet of my mother's sewing room. She died in March of ovarian cancer and I had to clean out her sewing room. I never looked in these boxes because they were hard to reach and I thought they had record stuff in them--they were above a bunch of records in the closet.
I opened the black (navy?) one first--Sewing machine attachments! My husband put the gold one on a table, opened it, and said, "Look." 



It cost $24.99 including the cabinet. I bought a new spool pin, rubber bobbin winder ring, and felt pads for the spool to sit on. Also Sew-Classic recommends buying the marked throat plate as in the next photo. The machine had the plain unmarked one. Good advice. I even sewed those two squares together. Now I have to decide what to sew on it.Also, I did note that even though I had cleaned up the machine I forgot the presser foot--I'll tend to that immediately.
I can see why people like fixing old sewing machines. It's been so much fun, I'm going to keep my eye out for some more when I go thrift shopping.

The 15-91 works which is the main point, but it has a film of grunge. The film is only in parts. The photo shows it clearly. The top is clean but the lower part isn't. The flash made the grime layer show up more than it actually does. The problem is cleaning it without damaging the decals or scratching the paint. Everyone has their favorite cleaner and it's a matter of testing carefully. I spent a couple of hours scrubbing and managed to get only two inches nicely cleaned.
Here is the thrift store 15-91 cleaned up. I haven't finished cleaning the japanning (black paint), but the working parts have been cleaned. I put it back in the cabinet for now with a garbage bag tucked into the front for laying my tools on.
I spotted two small set screws on the gear and undid them to see what would happen. They are small! This released the armature. These machines really have such a simple design. As I had the motor off I saw that there were two small wires coming out of it instead of the usual one. Someone had drilled a hole through the motor cover to run the extra one out to the terminal box. They had also soldered over the brush on the bottom. I don't like this at all. It looks like the work of someone who thought they knew more than they did. Plus, the amount of grease in it is too much. More is not better. I called my brother who sat at the 201 while I told him what to do. He found the screw on the gear which had been masked by a glob of grease--that's why he didn't see it. I told him about my machine and its wiring and soldering. He says it isn't the best way--the brush can't be replaced as easily.

Remember the machine ran and then slowed down? I took the balance wheel off and looked inside. I was very technical and put an old sock over a screwdriver end and stuck it in the gear area--it came away with a thick gooey brown glob of grease. No wonder it slowed down. Gear cleaning tomorrow.
People have different opinions on what to clean sewing machines with. Many use kerosene and/or metal polish. I read one site that said sewing machine oil was safe to clean the easier jobs with--it works for me. I would stay away from WD-40, but that's my opinion. Also be careful of household cleaners. 409 apparently cleans some of the metal, but I'm not going to use it. Check out the sites on my previous post--those people know more about it than me.
Here's a download for sewing machine maintenance. It's for handcrank machines so it's a little different in some areas, but the basics are the same.
It looked dirty but not too bad. I pulled the bobbin plate aside and saw it's an oscillating hook. Turned the balance wheel and things moved the way they should. I thought it was a 15-91. I read some the day before about these machines. The 15-91 and 201 have the same motor. This could be a parts machine. It seemed in good shape. The wiring is new except to the motor. A spool pin is missing and the stitch regulator screw. The cabinet needs a new finish. The whole thing is grubby, but not bad otherwise.
Bad news. I phoned Dad and heard that the soldering went fine but a wire came loose from behind the motor. Luckily he talked to one of my brothers who also does wiring--he says he can fix it. It turns out he rebuilds motors in his spare time for his brother-in-law. Dad and I didn't know that or we would have sent the machine straight to his house.